More on Austrian Economics ...
Introduction to Austrian Economics
Podcast surveying the basic concepts of Austrian Economics.
Why Did the “Stimulus” Fail to Help the Economy?
Spending Money Does Nothing to Address the Economic Factors Causing a Recession
When Congress was debating President Obama’s proposed “stimulus” last year, two of the watchwords for the near-trillion-dollar boondoggle were “jobs” and “shovel-ready.” Now, given what comes out of Washington, one needs a shovel to clean up the muck, and I appreciate the politicians and the media telling us we needed to have our shovels ready.
Now that the numbers are in, however, it seems that money spent had no appreciable effect on lowering unemployment:
A federal spending surge of more than $20 billion for roads and bridges in President Barack Obama’s first stimulus has had no effect on local unemployment rates, raising questions about his argument for billions more to address an “urgent need to accelerate job growth.”
An Associated Press analysis of stimulus spending found that it didn’t matter if a lot of money was spent on highways or none at all: Local unemployment rates rose and fell regardless. And the stimulus spending only barely helped the beleaguered construction industry, the analysis showed.
Keynesians, not surprisingly, have an answer: The government did not spend enough. They reason that economic growth can occur only if “aggregate demand” is great enough to prevent an overall “glut” of unsold goods. (Like the mercantilists before them, Keynesians believe that recessions occur because businesses cannot sell all the goods they produce. Socialists similarly claim that workers are “unable to buy back the products” they make.)
Therefore if government is to prevent the recession-causing “glut,” it must spend whatever is necessary to cover any “shortfall” in private consumption and investment spending. Out of this “theory” we get the present “stimulus,” complete with the blessing of Ivy League economists (who seem to perform the role of the High Priests in today’s political economy).
Such a “theory,” however, is doomed to fail every time, and I wish to give some reasons why.
- Individuals are purposeful creatures, so their spending also will reflect their own purposeful behavior. (It is interesting that many people who endorse the “aggregate demand” terminology also decry what they see as “mindless consumption of the masses.”)
- The economy is not a blob into which one stirs in money the way one stirs in an ingredient into a cake. In other words, the economy does not have a “just add money” in a recipe. It is driven by people making purposeful decisions.
- An economy has a structure of production that when working well directs resources, labor, and capital toward those areas of production that reflect the desires and needs of consumers.
- When governments expand money through the central bank, the rush of new money distorts the production structure and changes the relative value of assets and factors of production. In the early stages of this government-inspired boom, the malinvested assets (the ones that become more valuable as a result of the artificial boom itself) expand relative to other assets.
- The credit-fed boom ultimately cannot be sustained, and it becomes painfully clear that malinvested assets (see the housing-real estate bubble) quickly lose their value relative to other assets. This is the beginning of the recession, which is a period in which the economy begins to reassert the “consumer-preferred” value of economic assets.
Attempts to “stimulate” the economy through massive government spending may put money into the pockets of politically connected people, but it does nothing to restore the economic factors to their proper balances. Instead, the “stimulus” only serves to further distort the economic fundamentals and prolong the downturn.
That’s right. The stimulus has not staved off a major depression; instead, it has ensured the greater likelihood of a major economic collapse by keeping the factors unbalanced and distorting the structure of production.
The fact that the “elite” economists ignore (or even mock) what is known as the Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle does not change the fact that it explains why the Keynesian “solutions” are making things worse. Government can no more end a recession by pouring new money into the economy than one can end a fire by pouring on gasoline. But it can burn down our economic house.










Comment by Don on 20 January 2010:
the party is over for the Keysians. Let the revolution begin.
Comment by Kent Lalley on 20 January 2010:
Dr Anderson,
Nice job and thanks. Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito!
“No one should expect that any logical argument or any experience could ever shake the almost religious fervor of those who believe in salvation through spending and credit expansion.” – Ludwig von Mises.
Kent Lalley
Somerset, PA
Pingback by Why Did the “Stimulus” Fail to Help the Economy? « thak’s cool links on 20 January 2010:
[...] The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty » Why Did the “Stimulus” Fail to Help the Economy?. And there you have it. Short, sweet, and directly to the point. [...]
Pingback by Rebellion News on 25 January 2010:
[...] Why Did the “Stimulus” Fail to Help the Economy? [...]
Comment by Robert on 26 January 2010:
I have come across another factor that actually has a logical explanation – the overall mood of the people. When the people in the economy herd more or less toward optimism or pessimism, consumer preferences and purposes themselves change. Mood influences action, including consumer confidence over whether they could pay back borrowings if they were to do so, or whether they would prefer to hold greater cash balances, among other things. As Socionomics explains, social mood is endogenous, driven by human herding, which is impervious to external events. When optimism waxes, people (including capital owners) are in the mood for expansion, and economic activity picks up. The reverse is also true – when optimism wanes or pessimism waxes, people move increasingly to conservation, economic activity slows down, and we see recessions and depressions. And as mood changes, different things start to matter. Virtues are focused on during increasing optimism while faults (like malinvestments) get overlooked or ignored, while faults gain the focus during pessimism while the virtues get overlooked, ignored, or denied, for one. There’s an article that should come up at the top of a search for “What happens during a bear market” which explains more.
Pingback by Three Million Imaginary Jobs - Page 3 - Political Forum on 19 July 2010:
[...] Good grief Frodly. Shall I counter with right wing blogs and think tanks that way the opposite? http://www.thefreemanonline.org/colu…timulus-fail/# http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-bl…imulus-fantasy [...]
Pingback by Suckered another liberal into a debate « Random Stranger on 6 April 2011:
[...] http://money.cnn.com/2010/04/26/news/economy/NABE_survey/ http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/not-so-fast/stimulus-fail/ [...]
Comment by a2575571 on 5 February 2012:
I’ve said that least 2575571 times. SCK was here
Comment by Condo rentals in Siesta Key on 5 February 2012:
I have been reading out a few of your stories and it’s pretty clever stuff. I will surely bookmark your website.
Comment by visit on 6 February 2012:
I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Great work!
Comment by fotografia slubna bydgoszcz on 6 February 2012:
Has anyone had any experience purchasing RCI points through E-bay? If so, how has it gone, and what things would one have to look for in such a transaction? I’ve seen what appear to be some good deals on there, but as with any other E-bay business, you have to keep your eyes open. Any advice or experience out there?
Comment by race car driving experience on 6 February 2012:
Superb causes but there’s one Id like to recognize extra approximately like I informed you Im new to tis blogging factor altho I’ve published a quantity of blogs I nonetheless have tons to be taught and Im interested within the one that says return in your outdated posts and edit them for web optimization like what do I edit to make them higher any words particularly I ought to upload ? Like I stated Im this sort of dummie at a few things and SEO I do not perceive thanks your article was once interesting. http://www.driversday.getlisted.co.nz/v8-race-car-driving-experience
Comment by kent electricians on 6 February 2012:
I’ve been browsing on-line greater than 3 hours today, but I never found any interesting article like yours. It is lovely value enough for me. In my opinion, if all web owners and bloggers made just right content as you probably did, the net will be a lot more helpful than ever before.
Comment by Greta Sipes on 6 February 2012:
I truly prize your work , Great post.
Comment by london photocopier on 6 February 2012:
Thanks for another informative blog. The place else may I am getting that type of info written in such an ideal way? I’ve a mission that I’m just now operating on, and I have been on the look out for such info.
Comment by 6uty on 6 February 2012:
I just couldn’t depart your site before suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the standard information a person provide for your visitors? Is going to be back often in order to check up on new posts
Comment by Cheap Moncler Jackets on 7 February 2012:
hope to read more useful posts from your blog
Comment by buy sell and loan on 7 February 2012:
Thanks for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I feel I learned more from this post. I’m really glad to see such amazing information being shared freely out there.
Comment by Book shelf bear on 7 February 2012:
Beneficial info and superb design you got here! I want to thank you for sharing your tips and putting the time into the stuff you publish! Excellent work!
Comment by kent seo services on 7 February 2012:
I will immediately snatch your rss feed as I can’t find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me realize so that I may just subscribe. Thanks.
Comment by office photocopier on 7 February 2012:
Thank you for your whole efforts on this website. Gloria enjoys making time for internet research and it’s really obvious why. Most of us learn all of the compelling mode you provide functional secrets via your web site and even recommend contribution from other individuals on that situation so our own girl is without a doubt understanding so much. Have fun with the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one performing a fabulous job.
Comment by bad breath remedies on 7 February 2012:
Wow that was odd. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t appear. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to say superb blog!
Comment by Tammy Silguero on 7 February 2012:
Hello, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam feedback? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can recommend? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any assistance is very much appreciated.
Comment by Yolando Eastland on 7 February 2012:
There are some fascinating deadlines on this article but I don’t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There is some validity but I will take hold opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like extra! Added to FeedBurner as properly
Comment by Robyn Bergmann on 7 February 2012:
I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet smart so I’m not 100% sure. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Cheers
Comment by Porozmawiajmy o kevinie onlione putlocker on 7 February 2012:
I’m just commenting to let you be aware of of the magnificent encounter my friend’s daughter experienced studying your webblog. She came to find plenty of details, most notably how it is like to have a wonderful teaching mood to make folks effortlessly understand some grueling issues. You truly surpassed our expected results. Thanks for rendering these good, healthy, educational and also fun guidance on your topic to Janet.
Comment by roksa on 8 February 2012:
Very helpful post mankind, thanks for the information http://www.thefreemanonline.org/headline/stimulus-fail/. roksa
Comment by sell gold on 8 February 2012:
I likewise believe thus, perfectly pent post! .
Comment by Pug Checks on 30 April 2012:
I’m curious to find out what blog system you happen to be utilizing? I’m having some minor security problems with my latest blog and I’d like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any solutions?
Comment by arnaque lecomptoirsante on 30 April 2012:
Wonderful site. Lots of useful info here. I am sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And certainly, thanks for your sweat!
Trackback by pulidores de parquet Barcelona on 2 May 2012:
thanks…
Thank you very much for the knowledge supplied! I was looking for this information for a very long time, however I was not able to find the trusted supply…
Comment by scissor lifts for sale on 2 May 2012:
I believe one of your advertisings caused my browser to resize, you may well want to put that on your blacklist.
Comment by Key West Chiropractor on 10 May 2012:
Great blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your theme. Thanks