About the Authors

... See All Posts by This Author

James R. Otteson

This Is America?

Our Liberties Are Being Usurped by Petty Tyrants

I have long had an uneasy relationship with airport security. Before September 11, I resisted the demand that I produce a government-issued ID, believing that it smacked too much of the “Papers, please” of the former Soviet Union that Hollywood movies used to mock and we free Americans used to laugh at.

I also used to withhold permission to search my bags. On one occasion before September 11, in the Birmingham, Alabama, airport, the security guard was nonplussed when I answered no to her perfunctory request for permission to search my briefcase. I told her, and then her supervisor, and eventually a man who identified himself as the head of security at the airport, that I am protected by the Constitution from unreasonable searches and seizures. I showed him the Fourth Amendment in the copy of the Constitution I always take with me when I travel. It meant, I said, that unless they had either a warrant or probable cause to suspect me of some crime, they had no right to demand to search my bag. They admitted that they had neither, but, in what was then a shocking revelation and now seems only to have been ahead of its time, the chief of security said: “Well, you have your law; I have mine.”

That was before September 11. Since then, all sanity—not to mention quaint notions like individual liberty, rights, and privacy—is fast going the way of the Edsel.

Several weeks ago in the airport in Traverse City, Michigan, my wife, my children of 8, 5, and 3, and I were all “randomly” selected for a complete search of all our belongings. I have never been subject to more humiliating treatment in my life. We all—including my three-year-old son—had to take off our shoes, and hand them over for “inspection.” I had to take off my sport coat and belt as well; and I had to hand over my wallet for it to be—well, who knows?

I made my usual protest about protections from unreasonable searches and seizures, but they fell on deaf ears. “We’re just following orders,” I was told. That was the defense Nazi war criminals used, I said. Following orders does not relieve you of responsibility for your own actions. “Are you calling me a Nazi?” one demanded. “You call me a Nazi again and you’re never getting on that plane!”

Whose orders are you following? “The FAA’s.” The FAA has instructed you to detain and search innocent American citizens and their families? “Where have you been lately, buddy? Haven’t you heard of what happened in New York?” But wasn’t that tragedy, like most terrorist activities against America, perpetrated by people who were not native-born American citizens, and who were not traveling with their wives and small children?

By this point I was surrounded by approximately half a dozen security guards and several armed National Guardsmen. I was informed that if I did not “shut up,” I would be made to “go Greyhound the rest of [my] life.” I asked whether I was suspected of a crime. I was informed that asking so many questions “about the Constitution and all” was making me suspicious. “This is America now, buddy. You better shut up and get used to it!”

I asked whether they now intended not only to violate my right to be free of arbitrary searches and seizures, but also my right to free speech. I was then told—through clenched teeth—that if I said “one more word,” they were going to “lock me up” and make me “go Greyhound the rest of [my] life.” “I have that power,” one security guard growled at me ominously.

My children were frightened and on the verge of tears, and my wife, also growing uneasy, implored me to simply let them do what they wanted to do. So after a tense moment I stood aside, escorted by two armed National Guardsmen, while several security guards searched through our bags. I had to stand by silently while all of our things were taken out and examined, no doubt with extra thoroughness to punish me for my impudence. My shirts, pants, and socks were unfolded. A man with no gloves on rifled through my wife’s intimates; he even fingered through her feminine products.

After some 20 minutes of searching, they finished, and allowed us to go up the one flight of stairs and walk the 50 feet to our gate, where one of the very same people who had searched us downstairs now searched us again before we were allowed to get on the plane.

Security Reduced

What has become of us? A once free and proud people lets itself be subject to this kind of totalitarian treatment? Searching my children, my wife, and me does not increase security one iota: as anyone with any common sense could see, we are obviously not a threat. Indeed, wasting time searching people like us squanders the opportunity to check people who actually are likely suspects. So it might in fact reduce our level of security.

I flew again just recently. During yet another “random” search of my briefcase, the security guard found a leather thong with weighted ends that I use to hold books open while I read them. (I am a college professor, so this comes in quite handy; my mother gave it to me as a gift many years ago.) The guard decided it could be used as a “blackjack”—apparently a device used to hit people on the head—and called his manager over.

I explained to the manager, as I had explained to the guard, what I use it for. I even got a book out of my briefcase and demonstrated. The manager said, “That’s fine. Let him through.” “But,” the guard protested, “he could use it to knock somebody out!” And he provided his own rather dramatic demonstration of how one might use it. The manager replied, “It’s no different from a fist—are you going to cut his arm off? Let him through.” I thanked the manager for her common sense.

Thus there is still some of that in airports—but it is increasingly uncommon. And the new security measures being adopted, which do not increase security and instead serve only to inconvenience law-abiding Americans, are quickly stamping out the last vestiges of reasonableness—not to mention liberty—at our airports.

The terrorist threat is real. As September 11 showed, it is all too real. We should not let our political sensibilities trump our good sense when actual lives are at stake. And we should not let our precious liberties—the very liberties that make this country worth dying for—be usurped by petty tyrants who are “just following orders.”

The invasive and unconstitutional tactics of such airport security are an alarmingly large step toward creating just the kind of totalitarian society our enemies hope to create. We must not let it continue.

James Otteson is a professor of philosophy at the University of Alabama.

There Are 12 Responses So Far. »

  1. Orwell was a little spooky. Big brother might be watching himself, but there are plenty of folks ready to find and harrass members of society who are capable of the mere thought of challenging ruling authority. Natural tendancy of humans to readily divide into “us versus them”. Lieutenent Calley is the norm. Can’t help it. Groups where people tend to do that have a better chance of survival. Only during periods of great duress do the outliers represent a better odds of survival.

  2. [...] As I wrote many years ago, before 9/11 I used to refuse permission to airport security personnel to inspect my bags. Since 9/11, however, I no longer have that choice. Either I submit to whatever the security personnel want, or I am indefinitely detained. Of course, I also have the option not to fly, which seems an awfully high price to pay. [...]

  3. [...] be killed by one of them in a terrorist attack.  The moral cost of all this is considerable, as James Otteson and Bradley Birzer [...]

  4. I will do my best to avoid flying on any planes within the United States. I am disgusted by my government and ashamed that so many Americans allow this to happen to them without uttering a peep, or worse yet, those cowards who try to justify it.

    The Founders were in revolt over a distant bureaucracy that taxed them unfairly. What would they say about a government that forces people to allow their genitals to be fondled by federal uniformed thugs?

  5. [...] be killed by one of them in a terrorist attack.  The moral cost of all this is considerable, as James Otteson and Bradley Birzer [...]

  6. You said everything in this article I wish I could have said so many times when going through airport security. The most recent experience where I had to go through the body-imaging machines behind a little girl almost put me in tears. I felt forced, violated, confused and embarrassed. I asked 3 different TSA members what the machine was I was stepping into (I previously did not know about the imaging machine and if I had known I would have opted out) to which nobody would answer only forcefully replying to step in and put my arms up. I so desperately want to be protected by my rights, the rights this county is built on. Are we not innocent until proven otherwise? Why does it feel like we are all guilty and in a lower class when we walk through security? Why should TSA members who have no right or reason demoralize us be allowed to do so and not have to answer up to it? It saddens me that out government would spend millions of dollars on something that is unconstitutional, hire people that do not up hold the respect of liberty and treat it’s citizens in a manor that feels grotesque and extremely perverse. I am relieved to read your article and know someone feels the same way I do.

  7. [...] be killed by one of them in a terrorist attack.  The moral cost of all this is considerable, as James Otteson and Bradley Birzer [...]

  8. [...] be killed by one of them in a terrorist attack.  The moral cost of all this is considerable, as James Otteson and Bradley Birzer [...]

  9. [...] be killed by one of them in a terrorist attack.  The moral cost of all this is considerable, as James Otteson and Bradley Birzer [...]

  10. [...] my part, I think the policy is grotesque and unworthy of a free people. I made this argument some years ago—shortly after 9/11, but at a time when today’s policies still would have seemed [...]

  11. One of the most widely accepted objectives of terrorism is to provoke an overreaction by the govermnent.
    Way to hand them a win, TSA.

  12. [...] be killed by one of them in a terrorist attack.  The moral cost of all this is considerable, as James Otteson and Bradley Birzer [...]

Post a Response

  • © Copyright 2011 Freeman - Ideas on Liberty. All rights reserved.

    65 queries. 1.621 seconds