Comments on: The Dynamics of Disintervention http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-dynamics-of-disintervention/ Ideas on Liberty Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:57:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Drik http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-dynamics-of-disintervention/comment-page-1/#comment-23286 Drik Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:19:53 +0000 http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=9376#comment-23286 Interposition instead of intervention Interposition, as championed by Jefferson and Madison in both the Kentucky and Virginia Doctrines, as a mode for Georgia to step up and protect its citizens more directly as should be its duty under the principles of state's rights and sovereignty. The 10th Amendment Center has proposed having the state set up a federal tax escrow commission, to collect all taxes asked for by the federal government from the citizens of that state. This state commission would then determine the percentage of the actual federal expenditures that were actually allowed under the enumerated 17 powers that the Constitution delegates to the federal government, and forward that percentage to the federal government, and then return the rest to its citizens. The state would also intercede to make it a jail-able offense for any federal agent, IRS or otherwise, to be trying to enforce federal law to override this state action. Precedent is in the favor of the state. We have plenty of county sheriffs here in Georgia who would be perfectly happy to be throwing some federal agent in their jails and sitting on them. Congress and the executive branch are clearly out of control and continue to spend and borrow as though there were no end in sight. A rational way to end the exponential debt seems to be by cutting of the money supply until they are willing to listen to reason. The absence of consequences seems to be always corrupting and the present structure does not regularly apply enough consequences for any of the federal government to have incentive to change their ways. Advantages for the states that set this in motion first. They will have a leg up on the retained funds. Makes much more sense that that the state always has to beg and fawn for tax dollars of its citizens, originally taken by the fed, to be returned to the state as federal subsidies. Unlike other nations, we were set up to be a united collection of states, not a single entity that has no boundaries or limits. This is interposition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEwADbas7L0 Woodrow represents our state of Georgia. We are represented by Woodrow's son Newt Dixon represents Attorney General Holder Weaver represents Presbo Interposition instead of intervention
Interposition, as championed by Jefferson and Madison in both the Kentucky and Virginia Doctrines, as a mode for Georgia to step up and protect its citizens more directly as should be its duty under the principles of state’s rights and sovereignty.
The 10th Amendment Center has proposed having the state set up a federal tax escrow commission, to collect all taxes asked for by the federal government from the citizens of that state. This state commission would then determine the percentage of the actual federal expenditures that were actually allowed under the enumerated 17 powers that the Constitution delegates to the federal government, and forward that percentage to the federal government, and then return the rest to its citizens. The state would also intercede to make it a jail-able offense for any federal agent, IRS or otherwise, to be trying to enforce federal law to override this state action. Precedent is in the favor of the state. We have plenty of county sheriffs here in Georgia who would be perfectly happy to be throwing some federal agent in their jails and sitting on them.
Congress and the executive branch are clearly out of control and continue to spend and borrow as though there were no end in sight. A rational way to end the exponential debt seems to be by cutting of the money supply until they are willing to listen to reason. The absence of consequences seems to be always corrupting and the present structure does not regularly apply enough consequences for any of the federal government to have incentive to change their ways.
Advantages for the states that set this in motion first. They will have a leg up on the retained funds. Makes much more sense that that the state always has to beg and fawn for tax dollars of its citizens, originally taken by the fed, to be returned to the state as federal subsidies.
Unlike other nations, we were set up to be a united collection of states, not a single entity that has no boundaries or limits.

This is interposition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEwADbas7L0
Woodrow represents our state of Georgia.
We are represented by Woodrow’s son Newt
Dixon represents Attorney General Holder
Weaver represents Presbo

]]> By: Fed: No More Mortgage-Back Securities | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-dynamics-of-disintervention/comment-page-1/#comment-23259 Fed: No More Mortgage-Back Securities | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:28:47 +0000 http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=9376#comment-23259 [...] Timely Classic “The Dynamics of Disintervention” by Sandy [...] [...] Timely Classic “The Dynamics of Disintervention” by Sandy [...]

]]> By: Atlas Sound Money Project » Blog Archive » “The Dynamics of Disintervention” http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/the-dynamics-of-disintervention/comment-page-1/#comment-21350 Atlas Sound Money Project » Blog Archive » “The Dynamics of Disintervention” Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:08:58 +0000 http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=9376#comment-21350 [...] “Examples of the move from piecemeal to comprehensive intervention are found in the 1930s after the collapse of social democratic policies in Weimar Germany and in the United States after the failed interventions of the Hoover administration. Both events heralded even more radical (and tragic) interventions. What we witnessed in 2008 in the housing and financial markets exemplifies in many ways the interventionist process, although it’s really just the latest stage (though not the last) of a long string of interventions begun decades ago.” Read more. [...] [...] “Examples of the move from piecemeal to comprehensive intervention are found in the 1930s after the collapse of social democratic policies in Weimar Germany and in the United States after the failed interventions of the Hoover administration. Both events heralded even more radical (and tragic) interventions. What we witnessed in 2008 in the housing and financial markets exemplifies in many ways the interventionist process, although it’s really just the latest stage (though not the last) of a long string of interventions begun decades ago.” Read more. [...]

]]>