Comments on: States’ Rights Revisited

By: stop spam plugin

stop spam plugin — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:30:11 +0000

Stop Link Spam…

[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read or services that we use. Here is the wordpress plugin that we use to stop spamy links. We love our website clean. [...]……

By: New England Patriots

New England Patriots — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:17:21 +0000

I just couldnt go away your site before recommending which i very loved the conventional info a person provide for your visitors? Is actually gonna be back often to check up on new articles

By: Drik

Drik — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:01:02 +0000

It is laughable the the authors of the Constitution, Madison and Jefferson, are discounted as not knowing what should and shouldn’t apply in their efforts at interposition, the installation of state’s rights to curtail non-Constitutional activities by the federal government. If they don’t know, than who does? The mininterpreters who came after? Not!.
Now we have lawyers who cannot agree on how to define “sex” who purport to give us an accurate interpretation or misinterpretation as to what they can get by with.
To misquote Wilfred Brimley’s character in “Absence of Malice”, it may be legal , but it ain’t right.
Our country is being sold down river because of a lack of people willing to do what is right. “Sold down river” refers to slave days and that is appropo as the boundless debt and taxes being bandied about will cause either enslavement of ourselves and our children to pay the debt, or the collapse of this government and the usurpation of control by people that don’t care about America. And those willing to work and produce will have their heritage and property stripped away through both income and property seizure and redistribution. Otherwise, how could equality of “results” be obtained.
The confusion that was allowed to exist was that social justice referred to equal application of the law. This is the duty of the government. Social justice as applied by the church, says that people need to be cared for equally as part of the community. The danger is when the government takes over the role of the church to mandate the same equal caring and equal results. In the church, members voluntarily contribute to care for all. The governement does not have the benefit of having everyone agreeing with this plan as governmentally executed. So it will state what percentage of your income and property that you must surrender, and if you resist, then its agents will show up with truncheons and guns and either beat you into submission and throw you in jail, or else they will kill you.
Nice that you get to “choose”.
Voluntary, just like Harry Reid said.

By: States’ Rights Make a Comeback | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty

States’ Rights Make a Comeback | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:31:03 +0000

[...] Timely Classic “States’ Rights Revisited” by Gene [...]

By: Healy on States’ Rights and Libertarian Centralists

Healy on States’ Rights and Libertarian Centralists — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:08:09 +0000

[...] is a great opponent of “libertarian centralism”: see Healy’s great articles: States’ Rights Revisited, from The Freeman, and the following 4 articles from LRC (all linked at his LRC archive) : Contra [...]

By: Healy versus Bolick and the Institute for Justice « LewRockwell.com Blog

Healy versus Bolick and the Institute for Justice « LewRockwell.com Blog — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:44:19 +0000

[...] another blast from the past. In the December 1999 issue of The Freeman, Gene Healy published States’ Rights Revisited (other Healy articles on related topics). The February 2000 issue contained an interesting exchange [...]

By: Healy on States’ Rights and Libertarian Centralists « LewRockwell.com Blog

Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:28:03 +0000