<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ought Implies Can</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:35:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Horwitz on Health Care: Ought Implies Can &#171; Daniel Joseph Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/comment-page-1/#comment-18162</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Horwitz on Health Care: Ought Implies Can &#171; Daniel Joseph Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=9028#comment-18162</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Horwitz on Health Care: Ought Implies&#160;Can By Daniel J. Smith  http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Horwitz on Health Care: Ought Implies&nbsp;Can By Daniel J. Smith  <a href="http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can we do what we &#8220;ought&#8221; to do? : Minor Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/comment-page-1/#comment-17684</link>
		<dc:creator>Can we do what we &#8220;ought&#8221; to do? : Minor Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=9028#comment-17684</guid>
		<description>[...] I just read a pretty good essay over at The Freeman, discussing the difference between what we can do and what we ought to do. Too often, people talk about what we ought to do before even considering if we can do it. The essay, appropriately enough is Ought Implies Can. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just read a pretty good essay over at The Freeman, discussing the difference between what we can do and what we ought to do. Too often, people talk about what we ought to do before even considering if we can do it. The essay, appropriately enough is Ought Implies Can. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakes</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/comment-page-1/#comment-17342</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=9028#comment-17342</guid>
		<description>I loved the article. 

It is all about the unintended consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the article. </p>
<p>It is all about the unintended consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cokehead</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/ought-implies-can/comment-page-1/#comment-9435</link>
		<dc:creator>Cokehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=9028#comment-9435</guid>
		<description>The article starts with a strawman, viciously attacks said strawman, and then insults the strawman\\\&#039;s perception on issues, using nonsensical metaphores and more philosophy than anything practical..

The problem, of course, is that it\\\&#039;s all a strawman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article starts with a strawman, viciously attacks said strawman, and then insults the strawman\\\&#8217;s perception on issues, using nonsensical metaphores and more philosophy than anything practical..</p>
<p>The problem, of course, is that it\\\&#8217;s all a strawman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
