http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/original-intent-and-the-income-tax/ Ideas on Liberty Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:51:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/original-intent-and-the-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-54749 Gillette Stadium Sat, 04 Feb 2012 09:38:35 +0000 http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/original-intent-and-the-income-tax/#comment-54749 I have observed that online education is getting favorite because getting your degree online has become a popular selection for many people. A lot of people have certainly not had a chance to attend a normal college or university yet seek the raised earning potential and a better job that a Bachelor¡¯s Degree gives. Still other people might have a degree in one discipline but wish to pursue one thing they now develop an interest in. I have observed that online education is getting favorite because getting your degree online has become a popular selection for many people. A lot of people have certainly not had a chance to attend a normal college or university yet seek the raised earning potential and a better job that a Bachelor¡¯s Degree gives. Still other people might have a degree in one discipline but wish to pursue one thing they now develop an interest in.

]]> http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/original-intent-and-the-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-49009 Gabriel RaZZANO Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:57:03 +0000 http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/original-intent-and-the-income-tax/#comment-49009 I agree with above~! the Constitution when reffering to "direct Taxes" always uses a upper case "T" When the Constitution is reffers to "indirect taxes" the Constitution uses a lower case "t". So when you read any of the "taxing clauses" it is up to the reader to know the difference between the two. the Founders know/knew the difference. Guess what the 16th Amendment uses when reffering to "taxes", lower case "t", so the 16th has to do with "indirect taxes" and undoubtedly the 16th has to do with "indirect taxes". As stated above. Just facts that I learned by reading the Constitution a hundred times, try it you be amazed on what you will learn~!!! IMHO the 16th was/is a scam set in to place decades before it's evil implamention decades later. Isn't great when things go as planned? I agree with above~! the Constitution when reffering to “direct Taxes” always uses a upper case “T” When the Constitution is reffers to “indirect taxes” the Constitution uses a lower case “t”.
So when you read any of the “taxing clauses” it is up to the reader to know the difference between the two. the Founders know/knew the difference.
Guess what the 16th Amendment uses when reffering to “taxes”, lower case “t”, so the 16th has to do with “indirect taxes” and undoubtedly the 16th has to do with “indirect taxes”. As stated above. Just facts that I learned by reading the Constitution a hundred times, try it you be amazed on what you will learn~!!!
IMHO the 16th was/is a scam set in to place decades before it’s evil implamention decades later. Isn’t great when things go as planned?

]]> http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/original-intent-and-the-income-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-48844 Joseph McNicholl Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:20:53 +0000 http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/original-intent-and-the-income-tax/#comment-48844 Being the authority We the People delegate into the U.S. Constitution is from us Equally, NOT by majority rule, who gave Congress authority to tax Natural Born Citizens/Americans Directly, when the rule of apportionment applies/governs Direct taxes ? You might want to read the Supreme courts ruling in Brushabber v Union Pacific R.R. ~~~~~ ' No new power to tax was given by the 16th amendment .....' Being the authority We the People delegate into the U.S. Constitution is from us Equally, NOT by majority rule, who gave Congress authority to tax Natural Born Citizens/Americans Directly, when the rule of apportionment applies/governs Direct taxes ? You might want to read the Supreme courts ruling in Brushabber v Union Pacific R.R. ~~~~~ ‘ No new power to tax was given by the 16th amendment …..’

]]>