<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Oakeshott on Rationalism in Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/</link>
	<description>Ideas on Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:40:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stop spam plugin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-60590</link>
		<dc:creator>stop spam plugin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=8519#comment-60590</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stop Spam - Wordpress plugin...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]please visit the site we follow, as it represents our picks from the most flexible wordpress plugin that stops spam.[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stop Spam &#8211; WordPress plugin&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]please visit the site we follow, as it represents our picks from the most flexible wordpress plugin that stops spam.[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Generalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gene Callahan on Michael Oakeshott</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-52099</link>
		<dc:creator>The Generalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gene Callahan on Michael Oakeshott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=8519#comment-52099</guid>
		<description>[...] to come across is an article by Gene Callahan in which he introduces us to Michael Oakeshott (Michael Oakeshott on Rationalism in Politics, Jan/Feb 2009), a philosopher who, I must confess, I had never heard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to come across is an article by Gene Callahan in which he introduces us to Michael Oakeshott (Michael Oakeshott on Rationalism in Politics, Jan/Feb 2009), a philosopher who, I must confess, I had never heard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-36329</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=8519#comment-36329</guid>
		<description>I find that this essay hardly even begins to understand what USA culture in 2010 is really about.

Speaking of urban planning, lewis Mumford was also very interested in this topic.
He also wrote Technics &amp; Civilization and The Pentagon of Pentagon. Two books in which he described the origins and historical developments of what he called the formative myth or meta-pattern that has always patterned Western Civilization. He called it the Invisible Megamachine. He also pointed out that the root motive of the entire Western cultural project, including its dominant religion, has been the drive to gain power and control over every one and everything.

A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since Mumford wrote these books. The all encompassing power of the Megamachine has increased exponentially. 

Put in another way every aspect of USA culture is now patterned by the &quot;values&quot; of the military-industrial-&quot;entertainmemt&quot; complex. And to the degree that the USA is effectively a permanent warfare state. Most of the &quot;entertainment&quot; is really pure propaganda for the system altogether. 

TV is easily the most dominant formative influence on/of USA culture which is now essentially a &quot;culture&quot; created in the image of TV. Vance Packard told us about this years ago, as did Stuart Ewen in Captains of Consciousness.

I would also say that USA culture is effectively a combination of the nightmare scenarios of Brave New World and 1984, with the masses effectively studipified and made self-oblivious by junk food and a cornucopia of all kinds of drugs, to either help them cope or escape. With the permanent warfare state and the never ending &quot;war on teror&quot; as the constant sub-liminal background pattern. The obese every-person is now the archetypal dreadfully sane every-person.   

Amusing them-selves to death (Neil Postman).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that this essay hardly even begins to understand what USA culture in 2010 is really about.</p>
<p>Speaking of urban planning, lewis Mumford was also very interested in this topic.<br />
He also wrote Technics &amp; Civilization and The Pentagon of Pentagon. Two books in which he described the origins and historical developments of what he called the formative myth or meta-pattern that has always patterned Western Civilization. He called it the Invisible Megamachine. He also pointed out that the root motive of the entire Western cultural project, including its dominant religion, has been the drive to gain power and control over every one and everything.</p>
<p>A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since Mumford wrote these books. The all encompassing power of the Megamachine has increased exponentially. </p>
<p>Put in another way every aspect of USA culture is now patterned by the &#8220;values&#8221; of the military-industrial-&#8221;entertainmemt&#8221; complex. And to the degree that the USA is effectively a permanent warfare state. Most of the &#8220;entertainment&#8221; is really pure propaganda for the system altogether. </p>
<p>TV is easily the most dominant formative influence on/of USA culture which is now essentially a &#8220;culture&#8221; created in the image of TV. Vance Packard told us about this years ago, as did Stuart Ewen in Captains of Consciousness.</p>
<p>I would also say that USA culture is effectively a combination of the nightmare scenarios of Brave New World and 1984, with the masses effectively studipified and made self-oblivious by junk food and a cornucopia of all kinds of drugs, to either help them cope or escape. With the permanent warfare state and the never ending &#8220;war on teror&#8221; as the constant sub-liminal background pattern. The obese every-person is now the archetypal dreadfully sane every-person.   </p>
<p>Amusing them-selves to death (Neil Postman).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-34810</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=8519#comment-34810</guid>
		<description>How would Oakenshott deal with current events and propose changes or solutions to the current society? Isn&#039;t always some degree of rationalism when choosing policies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would Oakenshott deal with current events and propose changes or solutions to the current society? Isn&#8217;t always some degree of rationalism when choosing policies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberal Family (of blogs) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The country is not a car</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-18257</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberal Family (of blogs) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The country is not a car</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=8519#comment-18257</guid>
		<description>[...] risks. The analogy is completely wrong. A country in fact is, as we should have learned from Michael Oakeshott, an association of persons who form certain common institutions and abide by certain laws and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] risks. The analogy is completely wrong. A country in fact is, as we should have learned from Michael Oakeshott, an association of persons who form certain common institutions and abide by certain laws and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Klein</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-2945</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=8519#comment-2945</guid>
		<description>Next stop, Adam Smith, whose &quot;Solonic&quot; sensibility is expressed in both TMS and WN (search on &quot;Solon&quot; for a couple of examples). I do think that he had the rationalist libertarian also in mind when he wrote of the man of system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next stop, Adam Smith, whose &#8220;Solonic&#8221; sensibility is expressed in both TMS and WN (search on &#8220;Solon&#8221; for a couple of examples). I do think that he had the rationalist libertarian also in mind when he wrote of the man of system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Laubscher</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/michael-oakeshott-on-rationalism-in-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Laubscher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/?p=8519#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>The poverty of –ism is well attacked by Oakeshott in both the content and title of Rationalism in Politics. But the author does not reach the depths of Oakeshott on the subject whose attack on rational-ism cannot entail a “necessary rational reconstruction”. There is something essential to politics that is potential and not mere actual. Worse, to rephrase the actual into an –ism of a single (demand)right answer deserves to be attacked as the aporia that it is. The evil is something more than Ryle’s ‘knowing that’, technique. It is anathema to human conduct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poverty of –ism is well attacked by Oakeshott in both the content and title of Rationalism in Politics. But the author does not reach the depths of Oakeshott on the subject whose attack on rational-ism cannot entail a “necessary rational reconstruction”. There is something essential to politics that is potential and not mere actual. Worse, to rephrase the actual into an –ism of a single (demand)right answer deserves to be attacked as the aporia that it is. The evil is something more than Ryle’s ‘knowing that’, technique. It is anathema to human conduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.thefreemanonline.org @ 2012-02-14 23:49:38 -->
