<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Stable Bulwark of Our Liberties&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefreemanonline.org/departments/perspective/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/perspective/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/</link>
	<description>Ideas on Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:40:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservatives Seeing Connection Between Big Government and Law Enforcement &#124; The Freeman &#124; Ideas On Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/perspective/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/comment-page-1/#comment-19357</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservatives Seeing Connection Between Big Government and Law Enforcement &#124; The Freeman &#124; Ideas On Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/#comment-19357</guid>
		<description>[...] Timely Classic &#8220;The &#8216;Stable Bulwark of Our Liberties&#8217;&#8221; by Sheldon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Timely Classic &#8220;The &#8216;Stable Bulwark of Our Liberties&#8217;&#8221; by Sheldon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Colp</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/perspective/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Colp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/#comment-977</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just testing&quot;.....&quot;I appreciate your concern&quot;...&quot;please excuse my venting&quot;  &quot;Thanks Mike&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just testing&#8221;&#8230;..&#8221;I appreciate your concern&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;please excuse my venting&#8221;  &#8220;Thanks Mike&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Van Winkle</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/perspective/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Van Winkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/#comment-944</guid>
		<description>Brian, please accept my apologies regard the \ around the quotation marks. We are working on the problem and will have it fixed asap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, please accept my apologies regard the \ around the quotation marks. We are working on the problem and will have it fixed asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Colp</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/perspective/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Colp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>If your comments page insists upon inserting   \\&quot;    every time I place a statement or word within quotation marks, we might as well forget the whole comment thingy. Your reproduction of my initial comment reads terribly.  Thank You FEE as representing yourself as a place to express (quotation mark) our thoughts (close quotation mark)in a forum free of bias.  I almost believed that economics was a branch of science that could not be altered by government policy.  I appreciate your inference to the contrary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your comments page insists upon inserting   \\&quot;    every time I place a statement or word within quotation marks, we might as well forget the whole comment thingy. Your reproduction of my initial comment reads terribly.  Thank You FEE as representing yourself as a place to express (quotation mark) our thoughts (close quotation mark)in a forum free of bias.  I almost believed that economics was a branch of science that could not be altered by government policy.  I appreciate your inference to the contrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Colp</title>
		<link>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/perspective/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Colp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefreemanonline.org/uncategorized/perspective-the-quotstable-bulwark-of-our-libertiesquot/#comment-823</guid>
		<description>I have understood the point of every single FEE essay until now  (yea though I not always agree, I always see their point).....There is a saying I am in absolute agreement with....\\&quot;Beware of the person who is so open minded that they exist only in air and have no ground to stand upon\\&quot;   This essay is either an attempt to play devils advocate or perhaps it is FEE\\\&#039;s new policy of an open-minded agenda, whereby, suffering the unfailing loyalty of the few, they give ground to appear willing to accept the semi-approval of the many.   (read appeasement)

I am in complete agreement with the unalterable truths contained within the writ of habeas corpus.  I agree that the perils to liberty are \\&quot;great and many\\&quot; as is stated above.  Yet the greatest peril lies within those who understand our man-made policies of liberty yet plan on circumventing said \\&quot;truisms\\&quot; by using those very same truisms as their means to create a scenario wherein those truths no longer exist.  

Where lies the greater danger pray tell?.....Does it lie within those who would use our liberty as a means to achieve an end to our liberty? (read \\&quot;whatever it is we have left) Or does it lie within those who strive to protect our unique form of liberty at the expense of those who deem themselves above and beyond certain unalienable human truths?

Tough questions !!!   

I have nothing left to say as I fully understand (yet refuse to accept) the double standard that exists in the present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have understood the point of every single FEE essay until now  (yea though I not always agree, I always see their point)&#8230;..There is a saying I am in absolute agreement with&#8230;.\\&amp;quot;Beware of the person who is so open minded that they exist only in air and have no ground to stand upon\\&amp;quot;   This essay is either an attempt to play devils advocate or perhaps it is FEE\\\&#8217;s new policy of an open-minded agenda, whereby, suffering the unfailing loyalty of the few, they give ground to appear willing to accept the semi-approval of the many.   (read appeasement)</p>
<p>I am in complete agreement with the unalterable truths contained within the writ of habeas corpus.  I agree that the perils to liberty are \\&amp;quot;great and many\\&amp;quot; as is stated above.  Yet the greatest peril lies within those who understand our man-made policies of liberty yet plan on circumventing said \\&amp;quot;truisms\\&amp;quot; by using those very same truisms as their means to create a scenario wherein those truths no longer exist.  </p>
<p>Where lies the greater danger pray tell?&#8230;..Does it lie within those who would use our liberty as a means to achieve an end to our liberty? (read \\&amp;quot;whatever it is we have left) Or does it lie within those who strive to protect our unique form of liberty at the expense of those who deem themselves above and beyond certain unalienable human truths?</p>
<p>Tough questions !!!   </p>
<p>I have nothing left to say as I fully understand (yet refuse to accept) the double standard that exists in the present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.thefreemanonline.org @ 2012-02-15 01:03:18 -->
