Secondly, having read Thomas J. DiLorenzo’s book: Hamilton’s Curse, I’ve gained a much clearer vision of early America and the hoodwinking that floated over from Britain in those first few boats loaded with Pilgrims.

DiLorenzo is not only a historian, he is also an Economist, which is exactly the resource a true Patriot needs to refer to, if they are to understand the HOW AND WHY of things being processed by our Government. There is the Fractional Banking Method used by the Central Bank (THE FED), and then there’s the Austrian School of Economics, which the real World has aloways assumed business would be done by. You may google at your leisure.

In the end, as I read what it is in this Blog, I now fully understand why the latter half of the 19th Century was so full of mis-direction and why Hayes consistently had such a hard time dealing with these (ahem) elected Carpetbaggers…. and today, we all get headaches from the Special Interest Lobbying Groups – guess what (?) They’ve been with us since before we became a Nation… as the rhetoric above describes.

Bottom Line? Rutherford B Hayes, was a Jeffersonian of the truest nature. And, I say this, had the American People been allowed to have a more capable understanding of that philosophy, then I put it to you many many more of our Presidents would have been like Thomas Jefferson and President Hayes. As it is, the ratio of Jeffersonian President’s is actually quite low due to the corruption in the North by the Bankers who had spent around 100 years fleecing the Agrarian(sp) South who had to worry about Trade Embargos with England, which limited the South to doing business only with the North – hence the Civil War (not slavery as many were taught later on).

President Hayes having the temerity to be fiscally responsible, I am sure, made him a great number of enemies in Congress – proof being how they overrode his Veto on the Silver issue.

If you are real curious on the topic – I would offer that you google which Preisdents payed down the National Debt, throughout our short History and wich ones were the most devastating by assuring the Debt would only grow – which is exactly what the (now) World Bank and IMF have been working so hard for, over the “last” 100 years.

There’s this -
1790: Mayer Amschel Rothschild states,
“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”

And, this -
1862: By April $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money has been printed and distributed. He states of this,
“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”

That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement,
“If that mischievous (U.S.) financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.
It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

While there are many ways to look at the world and this Country – the United States – the above commentary is specifically what Rutherford B Hayes tried, as directed by the Constitution, to accomplish … pay off the Debt, be without Debt if possible, and do it honestly so generations coming after his would hopefully enjoy prosperity as it was meant to be….

Folks – IT IS ALWAYS “ABOUT THE MONEY” … no matter which way you slice it. And, this, the Jeffersonians knew only too well.

Alexander Hamilton was an Agent for the East India Company, and therefore the Rothschild Cartel(Cabal).

I will make it a point to find more information myself on Rutherford B Hayes. It’s a shame he only wanted to serve one term as President – the good potentially that might have occurred will never be known.

Truly "responsible" budgets require the elimination of the biggest financial liability to every person on the planet—the State.

I wonder how many of the lesser known and un-acclaimed presidential administrations were actually the best for the country from an Austro-economic and individual freedom perspective.

It would be interesting to see some sort of rating for all of the administrations. Hayes and others such as Coolidge would be rated pretty high.

God bless men who have not seen the presidency as an ends or means but a trust to uphold the Constitution.