Rutherford B. Hayes and the Financing of American Prosperity
Rutherford B. Hayes, America’s nineteenth president (1877–1881), is generally dismissed as a minor, even below-average president. Matthew Josephson, the journalist-chronicler of the late 1800s, insisted that Hayes had “no capacity for . . . large-minded leadership.” Other historians have written him off as just another cipher among a string of forgettable chief executives of the Gilded Age.
But the truth is that Hayes was a strong and principled leader of firm character, who, during a critical time in history, shored up the country’s finances. His contributions to restoring American credit are worth noting today.
Hayes was a small-town Ohio lawyer until his Civil War exploits earned him a promotion to brigadier general and won him a congressional seat after the war. After one term in Congress, Hayes was elected three times as governor of Ohio. In 1876 he won the Republican nomination for president, and during the campaign that followed he defeated Governor Samuel Tilden of New York in a controversial election. Tilden won the popular vote, but Hayes won the electoral vote after a special commission awarded him the disputed states of Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana.
Severe Inflation
Once in the White House, Hayes withdrew northern troops from the South and thus ended Reconstruction. But the enormous financial debts from the Civil War still lingered. That war had been so costly that the Union could not secure the cash (that is, specie) to fight it. Congress and President Lincoln covered expenses by issuing over $400 million in greenbacks, which would not be redeemable in gold until some future date. The flood of greenbacks caused inflation and chaos—merchants wanted specie, not paper that someday might be redeemed.
Many Americans, especially debtors who liked the idea of repaying loans in inflated currency, welcomed the greenbacks and wanted more to be printed. The problem with that, apart from serious inflation, was that foreigners were refusing to buy American debt, which raised the interest costs on the almost $2 billion that the Union borrowed to fight the war.
In 1875 Congress had promised to redeem the greenbacks for gold in four years and Hayes ran his campaign on a pledge to fulfill that promise. “Low rates of interest on the vast indebtedness we must carry for many years,” Hayes said, “is the important end to be kept in view.”
As president, therefore, Hayes prepared to retire the greenbacks. He had budget surpluses every year in office, and he used these extra funds to help build up a gold reserve to pay off the greenbacks. So effective was Hayes at this task that when the official government redemption date (January 2, 1879) came around, few people stepped forward to get gold for their greenbacks. Confidence in U.S. credit was such that most people traded greenbacks at face value with confidence that gold would be in the Treasury if they ever wanted it.
Having solved the greenback problem, Hayes also faced a crisis with silver. From the beginning of U.S. history, gold and silver coins (and bullion) had circulated to pay debts, to conduct trade, and to transact business. Silver of course is more plentiful than gold, and the ratio had been 15 or 16 ounces of silver to 1 ounce of gold. The U.S. Treasury in fact minted coins and traded the metals at 16 to 1 during much of the 1800s. But that all stopped after the Civil War.
The problem was that active mining in the American West was yielding much more silver than gold.
Also, the demand for silver was down because the rest of the world was beating a path to a monometallic gold standard. By the end of the 1800s, with silver prices down, it took about 32 ounces to buy one ounce of gold. The silver miners believed this devaluation of their metal was unfair. Those who favored inflation were happy to agree: If the government would stabilize the ratio at 16 to 1, debtors could repay in inflated silver dollars instead of gold. Flooding the market with silver (fixed at 16 to 1) would have the same effect as running greenbacks off the printing press.
Hayes was appalled at the persistent efforts of inflationists to tamper with the currency. “Expediency and justice both demand honest coinage,” Hayes insisted. Sound currency and sound character were one and the same to Hayes. “A currency worth less than it purports to be worth,” Hayes observed, “will in the end defraud not only creditors, but all who are engaged in legitimate business, and none more surely than those who are dependent on their daily labor for their daily bread.”
Free Silver
The inflationists lobbied hard with their politicians for what was called “free silver,” which was short for the free and unlimited coinage at the fixed ratio. They couldn’t muster the votes, but they did support the Bland-Allison Act in 1878.
Under that bill Congress would be obligated to buy at least $2 million (and up to $4 million) worth of silver and mint it into special dollars of almost one ounce. Such “dollars” in 1878 contained only about 90–92 cents worth of silver, and Hayes was dismayed that Congress would even consider tampering with U.S. coins that way. He promised to veto any “measure which stains our credit.” When Congress passed the act anyway, Hayes vetoed it. Congress, however, overrode Hayes with a two-thirds vote, and the Bland-Allison bill became law.
The presence of these new silver dollars bothered Hayes, but American credit remained strong throughout the world. The greenback problem was under control and the government continued to retire the Civil War debt through annual budget surpluses. In 1880, for example, federal revenue was $333.5 million, which was $65.9 million—almost 20 percent—more than expenses. The biggest item in the federal budget was $95.8 million for interest on the debt. With diligence, Hayes had renegotiated much of this debt from 6 to 5 and sometimes 4 percent.
In an effort to slash future expenses, Hayes began efforts to make government bureaucrats work more honestly and efficiently. In the New York Customs House, for example, some officials were extorting payments from importers and other officials were drawing salaries but doing almost no work. Since President Grant, Hayes’s predecessor, had suffered greatly from the shenanigans of dishonest government officials, Hayes tried extra hard to reform the civil service and make sure government graft was kept to a minimum.
Finally, Hayes showed balance in his administration. When, during a massive railroad strike in 1877, a state governor asked him to send in federal troops to preserve order, Hayes obliged. But he would not use federal troops to break the strike.
Hayes was a constitutional president. He believed in an executive strong enough to veto bad legislation, but he did not want to expand executive powers beyond what the Constitution specified. Congress was where laws needed to originate and where most political debate needed to take place.
Politics to Hayes was not a career. After serving one term as president, he happily stepped down and returned to private life.










Comment by G. Wilhlem on 26 October 2009:
I grew up in Fremont Ohio, Home of the Hayes Presidential Library.
I had never heard of this aspect of the Hayes administration.
I wonder how many of the lesser known and un-acclaimed presidential administrations were actually the best for the country from an Austro-economic and individual freedom perspective.
It would be interesting to see some sort of rating for all of the administrations. Hayes and others such as Coolidge would be rated pretty high.
God bless men who have not seen the presidency as an ends or means but a trust to uphold the Constitution.
Pingback by Update | Burt Folsom on 24 November 2009:
[...] Burt has been under the weather for much of the last week. You can read his article in the September edition of The Freeman by clicking HERE . [...]
Comment by Sean Allen on 5 May 2010:
I have absolutely no idea how the State can claim to "pay off" debt that it borrows with money that it "borrows" from citizens. Does it pay back the citizens at some future date? Or is it defaulted through some airy-fairy nonsense?
Truly "responsible" budgets require the elimination of the biggest financial liability to every person on the planet—the State.
Comment by Born Conservative on 1 July 2010:
First off, Sean – when you are talking about a Nation, you always use little “s” when using the word [state] … and when you discuss Delaware or Indiana, then you print it as [State]. I gather you mean ‘state’ in your comment….
Secondly, having read Thomas J. DiLorenzo’s book: Hamilton’s Curse, I’ve gained a much clearer vision of early America and the hoodwinking that floated over from Britain in those first few boats loaded with Pilgrims.
DiLorenzo is not only a historian, he is also an Economist, which is exactly the resource a true Patriot needs to refer to, if they are to understand the HOW AND WHY of things being processed by our Government. There is the Fractional Banking Method used by the Central Bank (THE FED), and then there’s the Austrian School of Economics, which the real World has aloways assumed business would be done by. You may google at your leisure.
In the end, as I read what it is in this Blog, I now fully understand why the latter half of the 19th Century was so full of mis-direction and why Hayes consistently had such a hard time dealing with these (ahem) elected Carpetbaggers…. and today, we all get headaches from the Special Interest Lobbying Groups – guess what (?) They’ve been with us since before we became a Nation… as the rhetoric above describes.
Bottom Line? Rutherford B Hayes, was a Jeffersonian of the truest nature. And, I say this, had the American People been allowed to have a more capable understanding of that philosophy, then I put it to you many many more of our Presidents would have been like Thomas Jefferson and President Hayes. As it is, the ratio of Jeffersonian President’s is actually quite low due to the corruption in the North by the Bankers who had spent around 100 years fleecing the Agrarian(sp) South who had to worry about Trade Embargos with England, which limited the South to doing business only with the North – hence the Civil War (not slavery as many were taught later on).
President Hayes having the temerity to be fiscally responsible, I am sure, made him a great number of enemies in Congress – proof being how they overrode his Veto on the Silver issue.
If you are real curious on the topic – I would offer that you google which Preisdents payed down the National Debt, throughout our short History and wich ones were the most devastating by assuring the Debt would only grow – which is exactly what the (now) World Bank and IMF have been working so hard for, over the “last” 100 years.
There’s this -
1790: Mayer Amschel Rothschild states,
“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”
And, this -
1862: By April $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money has been printed and distributed. He states of this,
“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”
That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement,
“If that mischievous (U.S.) financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.
It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”
While there are many ways to look at the world and this Country – the United States – the above commentary is specifically what Rutherford B Hayes tried, as directed by the Constitution, to accomplish … pay off the Debt, be without Debt if possible, and do it honestly so generations coming after his would hopefully enjoy prosperity as it was meant to be….
Folks – IT IS ALWAYS “ABOUT THE MONEY” … no matter which way you slice it. And, this, the Jeffersonians knew only too well.
Alexander Hamilton was an Agent for the East India Company, and therefore the Rothschild Cartel(Cabal).
I will make it a point to find more information myself on Rutherford B Hayes. It’s a shame he only wanted to serve one term as President – the good potentially that might have occurred will never be known.