John D. Rockefeller and the Oil Industry
Burt Folsom is Associate Professor of History at Murray State University. This article is adapted from his book, Entrepreneurs vs. The State, available at $14.00 from FEE.
In 1885, John D. Rockefeller wrote one of his partners, “Let the good work go on. We must ever remember we are refining oil for the poor man and he must have it cheap and good.” Or as he put it to another partner: “Hope we can continue to hold out with the best illuminator in the world at the lowest price.”
Even after 20 years in the oil business, “the best . . . at the lowest price” was still Rockefeller’s goal; his Standard Oil Company had already captured 90 per cent of America’s oil refining and had pushed the price down from 58 cents to eight cents a gallon. His well-groomed horses delivered blue barrels of oil throughout America’s cities and were already symbols of excellence and efficiency. Consumers were not only choosing Standard Oil over that of his competitors; they were also preferring it to coal oil, whale oil, and electricity. Millions of Americans illuminated their homes with Standard Oil for one cent per hour; in doing so, they made Rockefeller the wealthiest man in American history.
Rockefeller’s early life hardly seemed the making of a near billionaire. His father was a peddler who often struggled to make ends meet. His mother stayed at home to raise their six children. They moved around upstate New York—from Richford to Moravia to Oswego—and eventually settled in Cleveland, Ohio. John D. was the oldest son. Although he didn’t have new suits or a fashionable home, his family life was stable. From his father he learned how to earn money and hold on to it; from his mother he learned to put God first in his life, to be honest, and to help others.
“From the beginning,” Rockefeller said, “I was trained to work, to save, and to give.” He did all three of these things shortly after he graduated from the Cleveland public high school. He always remembered the “momentous day” in 1855, when he began work at age sixteen as an assistant bookkeeper for 50 cents per day.
On the job Rockefeller had a fixation for honest business. He later said, “I had learned the underlying principles of business as well as many men acquire them by the time they are forty.” His first partner, Maurice Clark, said that Rockefeller “was methodical to an extreme, careful as to details and exacting to a fraction. If there was a cent due us he wanted it. If there was a cent due a customer he wanted the customer to have it.” Such precision irr-tated some debtors, but it won him the confidence of many Cleveland businessmen; at age nineteen Rockefeller went into the grain shipping business on Lake Erie and soon began dealing in thousands of dollars.
Rockefeller so enjoyed business that he dreamed about it at night. Where he really felt at ease, though, was with his family and at church. His wife, Laura, was also a strong Christian and they spent many hours a week attending church services, picnics, or socials at the Erie Street Baptist Church. Rockefeller saw a strong spiritual life as crucial to an effective business life. He tithed from his first paycheck and gave to his church, a foreign mission, and the poor. He sought Christians as business partners and later as employees. One of his fellow churchmen, Samuel Andrews, was investing in oil refining; and this new frontier appealed to young John. He joined forces with Andrews in 1865 and would apply his same precision and honesty to the booming oil industry.
Discovering Crude Oil
The discovery of large quantities of crude oil in northwest Pennsylvania soon changed the lives of millions of Americans. For centuries, people had known of the existence of crude oil scattered about America and the world. They just didn’t know what to do with it. Farmers thought it a nuisance and tried to plow around it; others bottled it and sold it as medicine.
In 1855, Benjamin Silliman, Jr., a professor of chemistry at Yale, analyzed a batch of crude oil. After distilling and purifying it, he found that it yielded kerosene—a better illuminant than the popular whale oil. Other by-products of distilling included lubricating oil, gasoline, and paraffin, which made excellent candles. The only problem was cost: it was too expensive to haul the small deposits of crude from northwest Pennsylvania to markets elsewhere.
Silliman and others, however, formed an oil company and sent “Colonel” Edwin L. Drake, a jovial railroad conductor, to Titusville to drill for oil. “Nonsense,” said local skeptics. “You can’t pump oil out of the ground as you pump water.” Drake had faith that he could; in 1859, when he built a 30-foot derrick and drilled 70 feet into the ground, all the locals scoffed. When he hit oil, however they quickly converted and preached oil drilling as the salvation of the region.
There were few barriers to entering the oil business: drilling equipment cost less than $1,000, and oil land seemed abundant. By the early 1860s, speculators were swarming northwest Pennsylvania, cluttering it with derricks, pipes, tanks, and barrels. “Good news for whales,” concluded one newspaper. America had become hooked on kerosene.
Cleveland was a mere hundred miles from the oil region, and Rockefeller was fascinated with the prospects of refining oil into kerosene. He may have visited the region as early as 1862. By 1863 he was talking oil with Samuel Andrews, and two years later they built a refinery together. Two things about the oil industry, however, bothered Rockefeller right from the start: the appalling waste and the fluctuating prices.
The overproducing of oil and the developing of new markets caused the price of oil to fluctuate wildly. In 1862 a barrel (42 gallons) of oil dropped in value from $4.00 to 35 cents. Later, when President Lincoln bought oil to fight the Civil War, the price jumped back to $4.00, then to $13.75. A blacksmith took $200 worth of drilling equipment and drilled a well worth $100,000. Others, with better drills and richer holes, dug four wells worth $200,000. Along side the new millionaires of the moment were the thousands of fortune hunters who came from all over to lease land and kick down shafts into it with cheap foot drills. Most failed. Even Colonel Drake died in poverty. As J. W. Trowbridge wrote, “Almost everybody you meet has been suddenly enriched or suddenly ruined (perhaps both within a short space of time), or knows plenty of people who have.”
Those few who struck oil often wasted more than they sold. Thousands of barrels of oil poured into Oil Creek, not into tanks. Local creek bottoms were often flooded with runaway oil; the Allegheny River smelled of oil and glistened with it for many miles toward Pittsburgh. Gushers of wasted oil were bad enough; sometimes a careless smoker would turn a spouting well into a killing inferno. Other wasters would torpedo holes with nitroglycerine, sometimes losing the oil and their lives.
Rockefeller was intrigued with the future of the oil industry, but was repelled by its past. He shunned the drills and derricks and chose the refining end instead. Refining eventually became very costly, but in the 1860s the main supplies were only barrels, a trough, a tank, and a still in which to boil the oil. The yield would usually be about 60 per cent kerosene, 10 per cent gasoline, 5 to 10 per cent benzol or naphtha, with the rest being tar and wastes.
High prices and dreams of quick riches brought many into refining, and this attracted
Rockefeller, too. But right from the start, he believed that the path to success was to cut waste and produce the best product at the lowest price. Sam Andrews, his partner, worked on getting more kerosene per barrel of crude. Both men searched for uses for the byproducts: they used the gasoline for fuel, some of the tars for paving, and shipped the naphtha to gas plants. They also sold lubricating oil, vaseline, and paraffin for making candles. Other Cleveland refiners, by contrast, were wasteful: they dumped their gasoline into the Cuyahoga River, they threw out other byproducts, and they spilled oil throughout the city.
In Search of Ways to Save
Rockefeller was constantly looking for ways to save. For example, he built his refineries well and bought no insurance. He also employed his own plumber and almost halved the cost of labor, pipes, and plumbing materials. Coopers charged $2.50 per barrel; Rockefeller cut this to $.96 when he bought his own tracts of white oak timber, his own kilns to dry the wood, and his own wagons and horses to haul it to Cleveland. There with machines he made the barrels, then hooped them, glued them, and painted them blue. Rockefeller and Andrews soon became the largest refiners in Cleveland. In 1870, they reorganized with Rockefeller’s brother William, and Henry Flagler, the son of a Presbyterian minister. They renamed their enterprise Standard Oil.
Under Rockefeller’s leadership, they plowed the profits into bigger and better equipment. As their volume increased, they hired chemists and developed 300 by-products from each barrel of oil. These ranged from paint and varnish to dozens of lubricating oils to anesthetics. As for the main product, kerosene, Rockefeller made it so cheaply that whale oil, coal oil, and, for a while, electricity lost out in the race to light American homes, factories, and streets. “We had vision,” Rockefeller later said. “We saw the vast possibilities of the oil industry, stood at the center of it, and brought our knowledge and imagination and business experience to bear in a dozen, in twenty, in thirty directions.”
Another area of savings came from rebates from railroads. The major eastern railroads—the New York Central, the Erie, and the Penn-sylvania—all wanted to ship oil and were willing to give discounts, or rebates, to large shippers. These rebates were customary and dated back to the first shipments of oil. As the largest oil refiner in America, Rockefeller was in a good position to save money for himself and for the railroad as well. He promised to ship 60 carloads of oil daily and provide all the loading and unloading services. All the railroads had to do was to ship it east. Commodore Vanderbilt of the New York Central was delighted to give Rockefeller the largest rebate he gave any shipper for the chance to have the most regular, quick, and efficient deliveries. When smaller oil men screamed about rate discrimination, Vanderbilt’s spokesmen gladly promised the same rebate to anyone else who would give him the same volume of business. Since no other refiner was as efficient as Rockefeller, no one else got Standard Oil’s discount.
Many of Rockefeller’s competitors condemned him for receiving such large rebates. But Rockefeller never would have gotten them had he not been the largest shipper of oil. These rebates, on top of his remarkable efficiency, meant that most refiners could not compete. From 1865 to 1870, the price of kerosene dropped from 58 to 26 ceres per gallon.
Rockefeller made profits during every one of these years, but most of Cleveland’s refiners disappeared. Naturally, there were hard feelings. Henry Demarest Lloyd, whose cousin was an unhappy oil man, wrote Wealth Against Commonwealth in 1894 to denounce Rockefeller. Ida Tarbell, whose father was a Pennsylvania oil producer, attacked Rockefeller in a series of articles for McClure’s magazine.
A Boon for Consumers
Some of the oil producers were unhappy, but American consumers were pleased that Rockefeller was selling cheap oil. Before 1870, only the rich could afford whale oil and candles. The rest had to go to bed early to save money. By the 1870s, with the drop in the price of kerosene, middle and working class people all over the nation could afford the one cent an hour that it cost to light their homes at night. Working and reading became after-dark activities new to most Americans in the 1870s.
Rockefeller quickly learned that he couldn’t please everyone by making cheap oil. He pleased no one, though, when he briefly turned to political entrepreneurship in 1872. He joined a pool called the South Improvement Company and it turned out to be one of the biggest mistakes in his life.
The scheme was hatched by Tom Scott of the Pennsylvania Railroad. Scott was nervous about low oil prices and falling railroad rates. He thought that if the large refiners and railroads got together they could artificially fix high prices for themselves. Rockefeller decided to join because he would get not only large rebates, but also drawbacks, which were discounts on that oil which his competitors, not he, shipped. The small producers and refiners bitterly attacked Rockefeller and forced the Pennsylvania Legislature to revoke the charter of the South Improvement Company. No oil was ever shipped under this pool, but Rockefeller got bad publicity from it and later admitted that he had been wrong.
At first, the idea of a pool appealed to Rockefeller because it might stop the glut, the waste, the inefficiency, and the fluctuating prices of oil. The South Improvement Company showed him that this would not work, so he turned to market entrepreneurship instead. He decided to become the biggest and best refiner in the world. First, he put his chemists to work trying to extract even more from each barrel of crude. More important, he tried to integrate Standard Oil vertically and horizontally by getting dozens of other refiners to join him. Rockefeller bought their plants and talent; he gave the owners cash or stock in Standard Oil.
From Rockefeller’s standpoint, a few large vertically integrated oil companies could survive and prosper, but dozens of smaller companies could not. Improve or perish was Rockefeller’s approach. “We will take your burden,” Rockefeller said. “We will utilize your ability; we will give you representation; we will all unite together and build a substantial structure on the basis of cooperation,” Many oil men rejected Rockefeller’s offer, but dozens of others all over America sold out to Standard Oil.
When they did, Rockefeller simply shut down the inefficient companies and used what he needed from the good ones. Officers Oliver Payne, H. H. Rogers, and President John Archbold came to Standard Oil from these merged finns.
Buying out competitors was a tricky business. Rockefeller’s approach was to pay what the property was worth at the time he bought it. Outmoded equipment was worth little, but good personnel and even good will were worth a lot. Rockefeller had a tendency to be generous because he wanted the future good will of his new partners and employees. “He treated everybody fairly,” concluded one oil man. “When we sold out he gave us a fair price. Some refiners tried to impose on him and when they found they could not do it, they abused him. I remember one man whose refinery was worth $6,000, or at most $8,000. His friends told him, ‘Mr. Rockefeller ought to give you $100,000 for that.’ Of course Mr. Rockefeller refused to pay more than the refinery was worth, and the man . . . abused Mr. Rockefeller.”
Cutting Costs
Bigness was not Rockefeller’s real g0al. It was just a means of cutting costs. During the 1870s, the price of kerosene dropped from 26 to eight cents a gallon and Rockefeller captured about 90 per cent of the American market. This percentage remained steady for years. Rockefeller never wanted to oust all of his rivals, just the ones who were wasteful and those who tarnished the whole trade by selling defective oil. “Competitors we must have, we must have,” said Rockefeller’s partner Charles Pratt. “If we absorb them, be sure it will bring up another.”
Just as Rockefeller reached the top, many predicted his demise. During the early 1880s, the entire oil industry was in jeopardy. The Pennsylvania oil fields were running dry and electricity was beginning to compete with lamps for lighting homes. No one knew about the oil fields out West, and few suspected that the gasoline engine would be the power source of the future. Meanwhile, the Russians had begun drilling and selling theft abundant oil, and they raced to capture Standard Oil’s foreign markets. Some experts predicted the imminent death of the American oil industry; even Standard Oil’s loyal officers began selling some of their stock.
Rockefeller’s solution to these problems was to stake the future of his company on new oil discoveries near Lima, Ohio. Drillers found oil in this Ohio-Indiana region in 1885, but they could not market it. It had a sulphur base and stank like rotten eggs. Even touching this oil meant a long, soapy bath or social ostracism. No one wanted to sell or buy it and no city even wanted it shipped there. Only Rockefeller seemed interested in it. According to Joseph Seep, chief oil buyer for Standard Oil:
Mr. Rockefeller went on buying leases in the Lima field in spite of the coolness of the rest of the directors, until he had accumulated more than 40 million barrels of that sul-phurous oil in tanks. He must have invested millions of dollars in buying and storing and holding the sour oil for two years, when everyone else thought that it was no good.
Rockefeller had hired two chemists, Herman Frasch and William Burton, to figure out how to purify the oil; he counted on them to make it usable. Rockefeller’s partners were skeptical, however, and sought to stanch the flood of money invested in tanks, pipelines, and land in the Lima area. They “held up their hands in holy horror” at Rockefeller’s gamble and even outvoted him at a meeting of Standard’s Board of Directors. “Very well, gentlemen,” said Rockefeller. “At my own personal risk, I will put up the money to care for this product: $2 million-S3 million, if necessary.” Rockefeller told what then happened:
This ended the discussion, and we carried the Board with us and we continued to use the funds of the company in what was regarded as a very hazardous investment of money. But we persevered, and two or three of our practical men stood firmly with me and constantly occupied themselves with the chemists until at last, after millions of dollars had been expended in the tankage and buying the oil and constructing the pipelines and tank cars to draw it away to the markets where we could sell it for fuel, one of our German chemists cried “Eureka!” We . . . at last found ourselves able to clarify the oil.
The “worthless” Lima oil that Rockefeller had stockpiled suddenly became valuable; Standard Oil would be able to supply cheap kerosene for years to come. Rockefeller’s exploit had come none too soon: the Russians struck oil at Baku, four square miles of the deepest and richest oil land in the world. They hired European experts to help Russia conquer the oil markets of the world. In 1882, the year before Baku oil was first exported, America refined 85 per cent of the world’s oil; six years later this dropped to 53 per cent. Since most of Standard’s oil was exported, and since Standard accounted for 90 per cent of America’s exported oil, the Baku threat had to be met.
The Baku Threat
At first glance, Standard Oil seemed certain to lose. First, the Baku oil was centralized in one small area: this made it economical to drill, refine, and ship from a single location. Second, the Baku oil was more plentiful: its average yield was over 280 barrels per well per day, compared with 4.5 barrels per day from American wells. Third, Baku oil was highly viscous: it made a better lubricant (though not necessarily a better illuminant) than oil in Pennsylvania or Ohio. Fourth, Russia was closer to European and Asian markets: Standard Oil had to bear the costs of building huge tankers and crossing the ocean with them. One independent expert estimated that Russia’s costs of oil exporting were one-third to one-half of those of the United States. Finally, Russia and other countries slapped high protective tariffs on American oil; this allowed inefficient foreign drillers to compete with Standard Oil. The Austro-Hungarian empire, for example, imported over half a million barrels of American oil in 1882; but, by 1890 they were buying none. What was worse, local refiners there marketed a low-grade oil in barrels labeled “Standard Oil Company.” This allowed the Austro-Hungarians to dump their cheap oil and damage Standard’s reputation at the same time.
Rockefeller pulled out all stops to meet the Russian challenge. No small refinery would have had a chance; even a large vertically integrated company like Standard Oil was at a great disadvantage. Rockefeller never lost his vision, though, of conquering the oil markets of the world. First, he relied on his research team to help him out. William Burton, who helped clarify the Lima oil, invented “cracking,” a method of heating oil to higher temperatures to get more use of the product out of each barrel. Engineers at Standard Oil helped by perfecting large steamship tankers, which cut down on the costs of shipping oil overseas.
Second, Rockefeller made Standard Oil even more efficient. He used less iron in making barrel hoops and less solder in sealing oil cans. in a classic move, he used the waste (culm) from coal heaps to fuel his refineries; even the sweepings from his factory he sorted through for tin shavings and solder drops.
Third, Rockefeller studied the foreign markets and learned how to beat the Russians in their part of the world. He sent Standard agents into dozens of countries to figure out how to sell oil up the Hwang Ho River in China, along the North Road in India, to the east coast of Sumatra, and to the huts of tribal chieftains in Malaya. He even used spies, often foreign diplomats, to help him sell oil and tell him what the Russians were doing. He used different strategies in different areas. Europeans, for example, wanted to buy kerosene only in small quantities, so Rockefeller supplied tank wagons to sell them oil street by street. As Allan Nevins notes:
The [foreign] stations were kept in the same beautiful order as in the United States. Everywhere the steel storage tanks, as in America, were protected from fire by proper spacing and excellent fire- fighting apparatus. Everywhere the familiar blue barrels were of the best quality. Everywhere a meticulous neatness was evident. Pumps, buckets, and tools were all clean and under constant inspection, no litter being tolerated . . . . The oil itself was of the best quality. Nothing was left undone, in accordance with Rockefeller’s long-standing policy, to make the Standard products and Standard ministrations, abroad as at home, attractive to the customer.
Rockefeller’s focus on quality meant that, in an evenly balanced price war with Russia, Standard Oil would win.
The Russian-American oil war was hotly contested for almost 30 years after 1885. In most markets, Standard’s known reliability would prevail, if it could just get its price close to that of the Russians. In some years this meant that Rockefeller had to sell oil for 5.2 cents a gallon—leaving almost no profit margin—if he hoped to win the world. This he did; and Standard often captured two-thirds of the world’s oil trade from 1882 to 1891 and a somewhat smaller portion in the decade after this.
Rockefeller and his partners always knew that their victory was a narrow triumph of efficiency over superior natural advantages. “If,” as John Archbold said in 1899, “there had been as prompt and energetic action on the part of the Russian oil industry as was taken by the Standard Oil Company, the Russians would have dominated many of the world markets . . . .”
At one level, Standard’s ability to sell oil at close to a nickel a gallon meant hundreds of thousands of jobs for Americans in general and Standard Oil in particular. Rockefeller’s margin of victory in this competition was always narrow. Even a rise of one cent a gallon would have cost Rockefeller much of his foreign market. A rise of three cents a gallon would have cost Rockefeller his American markets as well.
At another level, oil at little more than a nickel a gallon opened new possibilities for people around the world. William H. Libby, Standard’s foreign agent, saw this change and marveled at it. To the governor general of India he said:
I may claim for petroleum that it is something of a civilizer, as promoting among the poorest classes of these countries a host of evening occupations, industrial, educational, and recreative, not feasible prior to its introduction; and if it has brought a fair reward to the capital ventured in its development, it has also carried more cheap comfort into more poor homes than almost any discovery of modern times.
In Standard Oil, Rockefeller arguably built the most successful business in American history. In running it, he showed the precision of a bookkeeper and the imagination of an entrepreneur. Yet, in day-to-day operations, he led quietly and inspired loyalty by example. Rockefeller displayed none of the tantrums of a Vanderbilt or a Hill, and none of the flamboyance of a Schwab. At board meetings, he would sit and patiently listen to all arguments. He would often say nothing until the end. But his fellow directors all testified to his genius for sorting out the relevent details and pushing the right decision, even when it was shockingly bold and unpopular. “You ask me what makes Rockefeller the unquestioned leader in our group,” said John Archbold, later a president of Standard Oil. “Well, it is simple. In business we all try to look ahead as far as possible. Some of us think we are pretty able. But Rockefeller always sees a little further ahead than any of us—and then he sees around the comer.”
Some of these peeks around the corner helped Rockefeller pick the right people for the right jobs. He had to delegate a great deal of responsibility, and he always gave credit—and sometimes large bonuses—for work well done. Paying higher than market wages was Rockefeller’s controversial policy: he believed it helped slash costs in the long ran. For example, Standard was rarely hurt by strikes or labor unrest. Also, he could recruit and keep the top talent and command their future loyalty.
“The Standard Oil Family”
Rockefeller approached the ideal of the “Standard Oil family” and tried to get each member to work for the good of the whole. As Thomas Wheeler said, “He managed somehow to get everybody interested in saving, in cutting out a detail here and there . . . .” He sometimes joined the men in their work and urged them on. At 6:30 in the morning there was Rockefeller “rolling barrels, piling hoops, and wheeling out shavings.” In the oil fields, there was Rockefeller trying to fit nine barrels on a eight-barrel wagon. He came to know the oil business inside out and won the respect of his workers. Praise he would give; rebukes he would avoid. “Very well kept—very indeed,” said Rockefeller to an accountant about his books before pointing out a minor error and leaving. One time a new accountant moved into a room where Rockefeller kept an exercise machine. Not knowing what Rockefeller looked like, the accountant saw him and ordered him to remove it. “All fight,” said Rockefeller, and he politely took it away. Later, when the embarrassed accountant found out whom he had chided, he expected to be fired; but Rockefeller never mentioned it.
Rockefeller treated his top managers as conquering heroes and gave them praise, rest, and comfort. He knew that good ideas were almost priceless: they were the foundation for the future of Standard Oil. To one of his oil buyers, Rockefeller wrote, “I trust you will not worry about the business. Your health is more important to you and to us than the business.” Long vacations at full pay were Rockefeller’s antidotes for his weary leaders. After Johnson N. Camden consolidated the West Virginia and Maryland refineries for Standard Oil, Rockefeller said, “Please feel at perfect liberty to break away three, six, nine, twelve, fifteen months, more or less . . . . Your salary will not cease, however long you decide to remain away from business.” But neither Camden northe others rested long. They were too anxious to succeed in what they were doing and to please the leader who trusted them so. Thomas Wheeler, an oil buyer for Rockefeller said, “I have never heard of his equal in getting together a lot of the very best men in one team and inspiring each man to do his best for the enterprise.”
Praise from Others
Not just Rockefeller’s managers, but his fellow entrepreneurs thought he was remarkable. In 1873, the prescient Commodore Vanderbilt said, “That Rockefeller! He will be the richest man in the country.” Twenty years later, Charles Schwab learned of Rockefeller’s versatility when Rockefeller invested almost $40 million in the controversial ore of the Me-sabi iron range near the Great Lakes. Schwab said, “Our experts in the Carnegie Company did not believe in the Mesabi ore fields. They thought the ore was poor . . . . They ridiculed Rockefeller’s investments in the Mesabi.” But by 1901, Carnegie, Schwab, and J. P. Morgan had changed their minds and offered Rockefeller almost $90 million for his ore investments.
That Rockefeller was a genius is widely admitted. What is puzzling is his philosophy of life. He was a practicing Christian and believed in doing what the Bible said to do. Therefore, he organized his life in the following way: he put God first, his family second, and career third. This is the puzzle: how could someone put his career third and wind up with $900 million, which made him the wealthiest man in American history. This is not something that can be easily explained (at least not by conventional historical methods), but it can be studied.
“Spiritual Food”
Rockefeller always said that the best things he had done in life were to make Jesus his Saviour and to make Laura Spelman his wife. He prayed daily the first thing in the morning and went to church for prayer meetings with his family at least twice a week. He often said he felt most at home in church and in regular need of “spiritual food”; he and his wife also taught Bible classes and had ministers and evangelists regularly in their home.
Going to church, of course, is not necessarily a sign of a practicing Christian. Ivan the Terrible regularly prayed and went to church before and after torturing and killing his fel-lowmen. Even Commodore Vanderbilt sang hymns out of one side of his mouth and out of the other spewed a stream of obscenities.
Rockefeller, by contrast, read the Bible and tried to practice its teachings in his everyday life. Therefore, he tithed, rested on the Sabbath, and gave valuable time to his family. This made his life hard to understand for his fellow businessmen. But it explains why he sometimes gave tens of thousands of dollars to Christian groups, while at the same time, he was trying to borrow over a million dollars to expand his business. It explains why he rested on Sunday, even as the Russians were mobilizing to knock him out of European markets. It explains why he calmly rocked his daughter to sleep at night, even though oil prices may have dropped to an all-time low that day. Others panicked, but Rockefeller believed that God would pull him through if only he would follow His commandments. He worked to the best of his ability, then turned his problems over to God and tried not to worry. This is what he often said:
Early I learned to work and to play.
I dropped the worry on the way.
God was good to me every day.
Those who heard him say this may have thought he was mouthing platitudes, but the key to understanding Rockefeller is to recognize that he said it because he believed it.
When the Russians sold their oil in Standard’s blue barrels, Rockefeller did not get into strife. He knew that the book of James said, “For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.” He fought the Russians, using his spies and his authority to stop them and outsell them; but he never slandered them or threatened them. No matter what, Rockefeller never lost his temper, either. This was one of the remarkable findings of Allan Nevins in his meticulous research on Rockefeller. During the 1930s, Nevins interviewed dozens of people who worked with Rockefeller and knew him intimately. Not one—son, daughter, friend, or foe—could ever recall Rockefeller losing his temper or even being perturbed. He was always calm.
The most famous example is the time Judge K. M. Landis fined Standard Oil of Indiana over $29 million. The charge was taking rebates; and Landis, an advocate of government intervention, publicly read the verdict of “guilty” for Standard Oil. Railway World was shocked that “Standard Oil Company of In diana was fined an amount equal to seven or eight times the value of its entire property because its traffic department did not verify the statement of the Alton rate clerk that the six-cent commodity rate on oil had been properly filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission.” The New York Times called this decision a bad law and “a manifestation of that spirit of vindictive savagery toward corporations . . . .” But Rockefeller, who had testified at the trial, was unruffled.
On the day of the verdict, he chose to play golf with friends. In the middle of their game, a frantic messenger came running through the fairways to deliver the bad news to Rockefeller. He calmly looked at the telegram, put it away, and said, “Well, shall we go on, gentlemen?” Then he hit his ball a convincing 160 yards. At the next hole, someone sheepishly asked Rockefeller, “How much is it?” Rockefeller said, “Twenty-nine million two hundred forty thousand dollars,” and added, “the maximum penalty, i believe. Will you gentlemen drive?” He ended the nineholes with a respectable score of 53, as though he hadn’t a care in the world.
Landis’s decision was eventually overruled, but Rockefeller was not so lucky in his fight against the Sherman Antitrust Act. Rockefeller had set up a trust system at Standard Oil merely to allow his many oil businesses in different states to be headed by the same board of directors. Some states, like Pennsylvania, had laws permitting it to tax all of the property of any corporation located within state borders. Under these conditions, Rockefeller found it convenient to establish separate Standard Off corporations in many different states, but have them directed in harmony, or in trust, by the same group of men. The Supreme Court struck this system down in 1911 and forced Standard Oil to break up into separate state companies with separate boards of directors.
This decision was puzzling to Rockefeller and his supporters. The Sherman Act was supposed to prevent monopolies and those companies “in restraint of trade.” Yet Standard Oil had no monopoly and certainly was not restraining trade. The Russians, with the help of their government, had been gaining ground on Standard in the international oil trade. In America, competition in the oil industry was more intense than ever. Over 100 oil compa-nies-from Gulf Oil in Texas to Associated Oil in California—competed with Standard. Standard’s share of the United States and world markets had been steadily declining from 1900 to 1910. Rockefeller, however, took the decision calmly and promised to obey it.
Even more remarkable than Rockefeller’s serenity was his diligence in tithing. From the time of his first job, where he earned 50 cents a day, the 16-year old Rockefeller gave to his local Baptist church, to missions in New York City and abroad, and to the poor—black or white. As his salary increased, so did his giving. By the time he was 45 he was up to $100,000 per year; at age 53, he topped the $1,000,000 mark in his annual giving. His eightieth year was his most generous: $138,000,000 he happily gave away.
The more he earned the more he gave, and the more he gave the more he earned. To Rockefeller, it was the true fulfillment of the Biblical law: “Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom.” Not “money” itself but “the love of money” was “the root of all evil.” And Rockefeller loved God much more than his money. He learned what the prophet Malachi meant when he said, “Bring the whole tithe into the storehouse . . . and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour out so much blessing that you will not have room enough for it.” He learned what Jesus meant when he said, “With the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” So when Rockefeller proclaimed: “God gave me my money,” he did so in humility and in awe of the way he believed God worked.
Some historians haven’t liked the way Rockefeller made his money, but few have quibbled with the way he spent it. Before he died, he had given away about $550,000,000, more than any other American before him had ever possessed. It wasn’t so much the amount that he gave as it was the amazing results that his giving produced. At one level he built schools and churches and supported evangelists and missionaries all over the world. After all, Jesus said, “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.”
Healing the sick and feeding the poor was also part of Rockefeller’s Christian mission. Not state aid, but Rockefeller philanthropy, paid teams of scientists who found cures for yellow fever, meningitis, and hookworm. The boll weevil was also a Rockefeller target, and the aid he gave in fighting it improved fanning throughout the South.
Seeking Solutions to Social and Medical Problems
Rockefeller attacked social and medical problems the same way he competed against the Russians—with efficiency and innovation. To get both of these, Rockefeller gave scores of millions of dollars to higher education. The University of Chicago alone got over $35,000,000. Black schools, Southern schools, and Baptist schools also reaped what Rockefeller had sown. His guide for giving was a variation of the Biblical principle—“If any would not work, neither should he eat.” Those schools, cities, or scientists who weren’t anxious to produce or improve didn’t get Rockefeller money. Those who did and showed results got more. As in the parable of the talents, to him who has, more (responsibility and trust) shall be given by the Rockefeller Foundation.
At about the age of 60, Rockefeller began to wind down his remarkable business career to focus more on philanthropy, his family, and leisure. He took up gardening, started riding more on his horses, and began playing golf. Yale University might ban the tango, but Rockefeller hired an instructor to teach him how to do it. Even in recreation, Rockefeller wanted to discipline his actions for the best result. In golf, he hired a caddy to say “Hold your head down,” before each of his swings. He even strapped his left foot down with croquet wickets to keep it steady during his drives.
In a way, Rockefeller’s life was a paradox. He was fascinated with human nature and enjoyed studying people. Yet his unparalleled success in business made friendships awkward and forced him to shut out much of the world. To his children Rockefeller was the man who played blind man’s buff with great gusto, balanced dinner plates on his nose, and taught them how to swim and to ride bicycles. But from the world he had to keep his distance: he was a target for fortune hunters, fawners, chiselers, and mountebank preachers. Hundreds of hard-luck letters were written to him each week.
Retirement, however, liberated him more to enjoy people and nature. On his estate in New York, he studied plants and flowers. Sometimes he would drive out into the countryside just to admire a wheat field. Down in Florida, he liked to watch all the people who passed his house and guess at what they did in life. He handed out dimes to neighborhood children and urged them to work and to save.
Naturally, Rockefeller had some disappointments in his last years. He was sad that Standard Oil had been broken up by the Sherman Act and that the Russians had increased their foreign oil sales. He also was saddened by the Great Depression of the 1930s. Still, Rockefeller knew he had lived a full life and had been a key part of the two big transformations in the oil industry: the making of kerosene for lighting homes and the making of gasoline for running cars. Rockefeller loved life and wanted to live to be one- hundred, but he died in his sleep during his ninety-eighth year in 1937.
Comment by Andrew Obot on 6 June 2009:
I heard a lot about J. D. Rockefeller, but no article or book clearly detailed the godldy principles that surrounded his success. I am moved by this great man, and hope and pray that there arise in our generation, men and women tenaciously guided by this principles. May his legacy ever remain with us, and may his legacy help raise great men and women guided by same principles. Amen . . .
Andrew Obot
Comment by Daniel Schinzing on 19 October 2009:
What a puff piece!!! Wow! Now we know the Freeman’s true loyalties–to the foundations that are contributing to their existence. Honestly, Freeman, I’m glad you’ve now put it out into the public that you’re a mouthpiece for Big Government and monopolies, instead of the free market. This article has to be one of the most outrageously false portrayals of an American I’ve read since reading about some American alleged military generals of the 20th century–now there’s a bunch of liars for us to hold dear. Wow. How pathetic, Freeman, that you’d allow such tripe to be espoused under your name. But, I’m not surprised as I suspected it for about 20 years now. I just couldn’t prove it, but now I can. You’re frauds, Freeman and group!
Comment by Jason Liebe on 30 November 2009:
This is a great article. To anyone that enjoyed this article, read Titan, the biography of JD Rockefeller. It’s a great book.
Comment by Jayde Harrison A.K.A. lady TKO on 9 December 2009:
yea i agree .. y be mad when u know that nothing cant be done .. it would take god himself to change the outcomes of many things over the years, but i guess i cant change no ones mind and to be honest sitting there and not trying. dont help either but wat can u do this world has been messed up since bush was elected president . sadly the outcome of this country may not be a pretty one.
Comment by Kirti Seth on 10 February 2010:
I really thank you for providing such a vital information about my ideal Mr. Rockefeller, he was indeed a man of vision and above all he was the man for all humanity, he inspires even today. this information for me is worth more than million dollars.
Thank you
Comment by Kirti Seth on 10 February 2010:
do anybody have the book of titan: the life of rockefeller.
Comment by Steve on 4 March 2010:
Are you seriously defending this jack ass? Hes a crook and a traitor, and he needs to be put on trial for conspiracy to destroy the government.
“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it,” Rockefeller writes on page 405.
And this article supports this guy!?! Makes me sick…. Just because he believes in some god hes automatically a good person? Yeah what the fuck ever…. Whoever reads these comments in the future I hop to god you go to this website after:
http://waronyou.com/news/
Comment by Zardoz on 29 May 2010:
It’s a great injustice that there are so many movies about Robin Hood with the idea that he robbed from the rich to give to the poor and no movies about Rockefeller showing how he benefited the poor while becoming rich. Only the wealthy were able to light their homes at night until Rockefeller made kerosene so cheap that even the poor could do it. And the ubiquitousness of the automobile wouldn’t have happened if gasoline hadn’t been made equally affordable. Poster Daniel above has clearly swallowed the marxist cool aid. Throughout the article it is plain that big government is the villain how can he think that the Freeman supports big government.
Comment by everyman6 on 3 September 2010:
The envy of a great man that pours out from some of these comments is really childish. The leftists have really been effective with their brainwashing program. Very sad.
Comment by boo on 21 October 2010:
booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Jeremy Tan on 22 October 2010:
Dear Burton, thank you very much for your article. Its clear and succinct. I’ve been searching for a good article on Rockefeller that sheds light on how to marry Christian principles with business success.
It will be stored in my memory bank.
Comment by En on 9 December 2010:
The author just took this from The Myth Of The Robber Barons by Burton W. Folsom Jr. this in no way is an article reflecting the ideas of The Freeman.
Comment by billy on 14 February 2011:
i like this!
Comment by Zander on 18 April 2011:
Man, som of you guys have bad grammer. You guy need to go to Grammer class. Take some gramm crackers to. Maybe even your gramdma. Take your freind Gram tooo.
All seriousness aside. I liked the article. I was writing a paper on whether Rockefeller was a Robber Barron or Captain of Industry. I have seen a lot of evidence pointing towards Robber Barron, but this article puts a nice perspective on the subject.
Pingback by Profits II : Politics and Religion on 25 May 2011:
[...] clear example of this can be seen in the history of John D Rockefeller. While he is best known as the man behind Standard Oil, Rockefeller was a rich and successful [...]
Comment by Elomobor Izzi on 12 October 2011:
Thank you for this article, God bless you for writing it.
Comment by blahhhh on 13 October 2011:
i dont like this at all didnt help me 1 bit…
Comment by Beth on 20 October 2011:
For some people, the truth hurts.
It seems that Americans have been taught from a young age that big always = exploitation and bad. Rockefeller’s story shows that is not always true.
When it comes to big business being bad, it is when it gets into bed with government that it brings bad results. Hurray for Rockefeller for avoiding most of that.
Comment by Beth on 20 October 2011:
Thus the question is not to ask whether this article is a “puff piece” or not, the relevant question to ask is, is it true or not.
Some people will always have difficulty processing information that does not fit their world-view that rich people are always bad and exploitative.
Comment by Anonymous on 3 November 2011:
did he do any bad
Comment by jopopopopop on 5 November 2011:
this thing sucks. he is an ass
Comment by Coolest Kid 3 on 1 December 2011:
My dog is eating my homework
Comment by Coolest Kid 3 on 1 December 2011:
What should I do??
Comment by Chance on 6 December 2011:
The Supreme Court broke up Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in 1911 precisely because the utter largeness of the corporation had violated the freedom of the market for so long. This article and many of its commentators hail Rockefeller as the man who lowered the price of oil for the consumer. But what if that consumer ran a small local oil refinery in whose area Standard Oil artificially lowered oil prices to force its bankruptcy? After Standard Oil choked out every competitor by getting more and more monolithic, who could stop it from artificially raising the prices again, back to far more than they originally were?
Comment by poophead on 22 December 2011:
This article is poopy.
Comment by a852914 on 5 February 2012:
I’ve said that least 852914 times. SCK was here
Comment by Beachfront Rentals in Siesta Key on 5 February 2012:
I truly enjoy reading on this internet site , it has got good content .
Comment by Archie Marney on 5 February 2012:
Great blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your theme. Thanks
Comment by visit on 6 February 2012:
Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this site. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very difficult to get that “perfect balance” between usability and appearance. I must say that you’ve done a superb job with this. In addition, the blog loads extremely quick for me on Internet explorer. Exceptional Blog!
Comment by canterbury electrician on 6 February 2012:
It¡¦s actually a nice and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you just shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.
Comment by london photocopier on 6 February 2012:
It¡¦s really a great and helpful piece of info. I am happy that you shared this useful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.
Comment by Kiyoko Kief on 6 February 2012:
I must express my appreciation for your kindness in support of those people who must have guidance on your idea. Your real commitment to passing the solution across had become particularly effective and has without exception helped girls just like me to reach their endeavors. Your entire important help means a lot to me and much more to my peers. Warm regards; from each one of us.
Comment by horoscope yahoo on 6 February 2012:
Though running a business sounds cool and all that. But in precise fact, I feel it’s essential to kind a agenda so that you just don’t get too involved. I preferred that stuff you talked about “life is balance”. Possibly hiring someone do your work is a great idea. http://www.e-psychic-readings.com/horoscope-yahoo
Comment by Adrian Elsasser on 6 February 2012:
I simply wanted to jot down a small comment in order to say thanks to you for those splendid guides you are writing at this website. My time-consuming internet search has at the end of the day been rewarded with awesome facts and strategies to exchange with my great friends. I would claim that many of us readers actually are definitely fortunate to dwell in a perfect site with many awesome people with very beneficial hints. I feel very much grateful to have come across the site and look forward to some more entertaining moments reading here. Thank you once more for everything.
Comment by Thanh Zeiner on 6 February 2012:
I enjoy you because of each of your hard work on this site. My mother delights in setting aside time for internet research and it is simple to grasp why. I hear all about the powerful manner you produce rewarding thoughts by means of the website and even invigorate participation from others on the content so our own girl is certainly starting to learn a lot of things. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. Your doing a good job.
Comment by Toilet Seat on 7 February 2012:
how are you? nice to read your article
Comment by Carin Salato on 7 February 2012:
I am impressed with this website , rattling I am a fan .
Comment by Pawnbrokers on 7 February 2012:
What is wonderful respecting is dealing with rather of depending on.
Comment by Rustic Desk trends on 7 February 2012:
Incredible! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a completely different subject but it has pretty significantly the same layout and design. Great choice of colors!
Comment by Answering Service on 7 February 2012:
Suffice to say, regardless of how sound that you employing treating any kind of a platform, ultimately you’ll be able to discover an example in places require a quantity of tutorial holding; and as nicely subject to how old you are abilities, utilizing the body-weight of ones own caravan it may be a some what strenuous punch. motor movers
Trackback by stop spam plugin on 7 February 2012:
How to stop spam links…
[...]check below, this solution is used by most website and bloggers.[...]……
Comment by get rid of bad breath on 7 February 2012:
Hmm it looks like your website ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any points for novice blog writers? I’d definitely appreciate it.
Comment by office photocopiers on 7 February 2012:
whoah this blog is wonderful i really like studying your posts. Stay up the great paintings! You know, many persons are searching round for this info, you could aid them greatly.
Comment by kent seo on 7 February 2012:
It¡¦s actually a cool and helpful piece of info. I¡¦m happy that you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.
Comment by 6uty on 7 February 2012:
certainly like your website but you need to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth nevertheless I will certainly come back again.
Comment by hosting coupons codes on 8 February 2012:
yourself’m as burning with excitement along accumulative concentrating. alter ego was rather apocalyptic by the mated ethical self went up to. It is punk up to closed ego dispirited. All respecting those topics are movables her need to discover no finish touching unpronounced. Thanks so much!
Comment by sell gold on 8 February 2012:
I merely desired to thank you so a lot however once again. I’m not certain what I would’ve handled without the type of advice shared by you directly on this dilemma. This was an absolute difficult situation in my view, nevertheless being able to see this expert strategy you solved that forced me to cry with happiness. I is going to be pleased for this support and thus believe you know what a powerful job you were carrying out educating the others all by way of your website. I’m certain you’ve never met all of us.
Comment by Tory Burstein on 8 February 2012:
Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is great, let alone the content!
Comment by Aimee Summers on 8 February 2012:
I’ll right away grab your rss as I can’t find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Kindly let me know in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.